Megan Holden
Dr. Ellis
Understanding Lit
Sep 17, 2017
Blog 1
Baltimore
is composed of an assortment of closely-knit, eclectic communities that each
possesses their own unique flare. Hampden prides itself in being one of the
more quirky spots in the city, and Hampdenfest is a strange and wonderful
gathering of people who go to enjoy a myriad of food, art, clothing, and music.
When my friends and I first stepped into the crowded streets of the festival,
we became immediately disorientated by the amount of things going on. Behind us
the famous Toilet Races had just begun, to our right a man offered to let us hold
his 12-foot long python, and to our left a drag queen snacked on kettle corn. My
feelings of excitement and eagerness contrasted with how I had felt freshman
year, when I had come into Loyola knowing virtually nothing about the city and
feeling unprepared to navigate its terrain. Going to Hampdefest freshman year
was my first adventure off campus, and I’ve loved Baltimore more and more ever
since. I’m glad that Loyola pushes its students to familiarize themselves with
Baltimore because so many people who don’t know the city generally condemn it
as dangerous and violent. Hampdenfest draws people from all walks of life in
Baltimore, and the diversity of the city can be seen within this little
microcosm. Breaking down barriers and stigmas between the city and the school,
or in the world in general can’t be achieved through just observing or
commenting ones thoughts on something; it requires action. Whether that action
is going out and experiencing something new or speaking up for someone, without
action no change can ever come about.
The concept of action vs separation
is explored in Robert Frost’s poem “Mending Wall” which focuses on the
relationship between two neighbors who meet each spring to repair their sides
of a fence that separates their property. The speaker mocks the necessity of a
wall and argues that there aren’t things like cows that they need to keep
enclosed, to which the neighbor only replies, “Good fences make good
neighbors.” (27) The poem makes the distinction between two types of people:
wall breakers and wall builders. The neighbor represents those who maintain
forms of segregation, and justify their actions with clichés or by using
tradition as an excuse. While the speaker doesn’t believe that the wall should
even exist, he still returns each spring to repair the wall. This signifies
that while he may believe the wall is superfluous and observes the task with
detached amusement, he never commits to the action of letting the wall fall.
This highlighted to me the importance of actually taking action that comes with
wanting to change something, and not just going along with something because
it’s the accepted tradition.
This ties in with Father Kolvenbach’s essay, “The Service of
Faith and Promotion of Justice in Jesuit Higher Education” where he emphasizes
the importance of the Jesuit obligation to service, faith, and justice. He stresses
that justice requires an "action-oriented commitment" to the
poor. Action is always necessary for change and it is the main component
in breaking down oppressive systems that are deeply ingrained in society, like
racism, sexism, and illiteracy.
Frances E. W. Harper addresses that
such things like racism and illiteracy can be combated, and it requires action.
In her poem, “Learning to Read” she tells the story of an elderly black woman
desperately wanting to learn to read because she wanted to be able to read the
Bible. She recounts that white people didn’t want their slaves to be able to
read because they saw the power in knowledge, saying it didn’t agree with slavery
because “Twould make us all too wise.”
She doesn’t stop trying until she can read the Bible cover to cover, and
she explains the value that literacy had to slaves and how it was viewed as a
key to freedom as well as self-empowerment. She finishes the poem saying that
woman was able to even get herself a little house, "A place to call my
own--and I felt independent'. This proves the power of knowledge and how
the woman was able to gain so much from learning to read, and how the action of
pursuing knowledge ultimately gave her freedom and a sense of self.
In Jill McDonough’s “Accident,
Mass. Ave.” the author colorfully recounts the time when another woman hit her
car, and her initial reaction was to spit curses and scream with rage. She
notes that the woman is driving a beat up car and that English isn’t her first
language, highlighting their socio-economic differences. In the midst of
yelling at each other, both women notice that neither car was damaged. Without
anything to even be angry about, the author is brought back to reality and her
anger deflates. Road rage is a common occurrence for many people, but the
author shows on a deeper level that yes, were human. We can be irrational either
out of fear or apprehension, but we can always still apologize and make things
right again. She notes this when she says, “We were scared, weren’t we?” and
they both laugh. This shows that even though these were both two very different
women, they were able to see past their initial anger and allowed them to empathize with one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment