Sunday, October 22, 2017

Blog Post #4

Alex Uzunoff

            As I continue my weekly trips to Tunbridge Public Charter School, I continue to learn so much about myself and others. Through the different ways I communicate with the students and faculty, to how I connect the class readings to my experiences, I feel as though Tunbridge is a great way to bring together service and our readings especially this week.
“Theology” by Paul Laurence Dunbar, “Talbeau” by Countee Cullen, and Frankenstein by Mary Shelley are all works that center around the theme of acceptance and how individuals can often be scared or unwelcoming of something, simply based on appearance. In addition, I noticed that the works showed how humans sometimes crave fulfillment and acceptance from others. There are few things that can be left without question for us, and we almost always crave a type of gratification from others. We want answers and justifications for what we don’t understand. I was able to notice how these ideas connected to my daily life, specifically when I am at Tunbridge. It is interesting to see how the need for acceptance and answers to fulfill our curiosity are so prevalent in our daily lives.
When reading “Theology”, I felt as though the speaker needed an answer, or solution, to what his neighbors would “get” for their seemingly negative actions. The speaker uses religious beliefs about a heaven and hell to justify that those who do bad will end up where they are supposed to. I believe that this is an example of how humans always want an answer and justification for everything. In this poem, the speaker says “There is a hell, I’m not quite sure; for pray/If there were not, where would my neighbours go?” His knowledge of a heaven could be looked at as his way of reaching acceptance from God, while his neighbors get what they “deserve” in Hell. I was able to loosely relate to a teaching mechanism at Tunbridge I noticed. In Mrs. Grimm’s first grade classroom, students are often rewarded and praised for their achievements, whether they be big or small. This positive reinforcement the students get from finishing a book or doing a math problem correctly gives them a sense of fulfillment and a reward for their work. On the other hand, students who misbehave and choose not to listen to the teacher can receive a “reflective lunch”, meaning they must each lunch separate from their class and write about what they did to receive this reflective lunch. I find this relates to the idea of getting answers, because the students are able to clearly be told what they did wrong and figure out how they can correct it in the future.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the theme of acceptance and fulfillment is shown again. When Victor Frankenstein creates the monster, he is immediately frightened and disgusted by what he has done, and he wants nothing to do with the monster. This initial lack of attention and nourishment that each new life requires was lost at the very start, which caused the monster to grow up angry and violent. The creature was not born with bad intentions, but was rather neglected and did not know anything else. The lack of acceptance the creature received from the start correlates to the way he acts as time goes on. The monster sees himself as ugly and is mocked by others for this as well, when all he really wants is some type of acceptance and reassurance that he is more than just an unattraction creation. The isolation the monster experiences ultimately leads to him being violent. I think that because it is so important to grow up with the attention and fulfillment of other people’s love, Tunbridge places a big importance on making sure the children always interact with each other nicely, and nobody feels left out. I know that from a young age, we are always taught to be inclusive and not judged on appearance, and I see this with the Tunbridge first grade class. I have personally never seen the children not being inclusive or malicious towards one another. For example, one little girl was reading her books on the carpet, and she was very sweet about making room for another little boy who wanted to sit with her as well. Then, the little boy knew to be nice to another student who wants to join, and he even helped make room for him on the carpet. I think even little instances like this show how important inclusion is, while Frankenstein shows how detrimental feeling unaccepted and judged can be.

The last work, “Tableau”, by Countee Cullen is another example of how quickly appearance can be judged. Two boys, one black and one white, simply walking together “arm in arm” is able to set off stares and talk from others. The speaker says, “Indignant that these two should dare/In unison to walk.” Such a simple action is questioned by many, because they cannot understand why. They are so taken back by the action of two boys of different race together, that they simply cannot let it go. Their curiosity and inability to accept/understand is shown through this. While at Tunbridge, I have found that children love to ask “why?” They can never fully be satisfied unless they know what is going on. I think that curiosity is an amazing quality for these first graders to have, but curiosity can also be turned negative as shown in the poem.

No comments:

Post a Comment